China’s military unification plan (8): South Korea’s difficult path

(This is an outline for an incomplete research project.)

Preview Date

Mar. 29, 2023

Updated Date

September 8, 2023

 

summary:

South Korea is an unavoidable party in the script of the US-China conflict. It is a major member of the US-led alliance and a key participant in the early and low-level conflicts. However, South Korea lacks the political foundation for a full-scale war with China, Russia, or even North Korea. This political deficiency allows South Korea to actively intervene in low-level conflicts but prevents it from engaging in medium- or more serious military operations. As the level of conflict escalates, South Korea’s rapid withdrawal from the war process is a foreseeable assumption.

Keywords:

2026, Asian Wars, US-China Conflict, South Korea,

The inherent characteristics of South Koreans can be described as strong-willed, even recklessly so. They are unwilling to remain insignificant on the political stage. During the era of the Chinese imperial order, they took pride in calling themselves “Little China.” During the era of the American imperial order, they called themselves “Jerusalem of the East.” South Korea often closely follows American political decisions with the most conspicuous actions.
Unfortunately, in the Sino-US conflict in Asia, South Korea is the least powerful participant. Although South Korea has a stronger independent decision-making capacity than Japan, its political decisions are heavily influenced by those of its neighbors. Whether it’s the United States, China, Russia, Japan, or even North Korea, any political decision made by these countries significantly impacts South Korea’s decision-making ability, decision-making state, and decision-making direction.

1. The influence of the United States on South Korea

The United States has extensive and profound political, economic, and military influence in South Korea.
South Korea is the second largest U.S. military presence in Asia. Wartime command of the South Korean military rests with the United States. The U.S. has deployed multiple missile tracking and monitoring systems in South Korea. The U.S. skillfully employs surveillance, exposing scandals, inciting protests, coups, and even assassinations to effectively control the fate of South Korean politicians.
In the event of a military conflict between the United States and China, South Korea would undoubtedly be a member of the US-led coalition, appearing on the front lines of the US-China conflict.
If the conflict between the United States and China remains at or below the level of a “pacification plan,” it indicates a tacit understanding between the two countries that the geopolitical situation will not be seriously altered. At this level of conflict, South Korea remains on the front line of the US-China conflict, preventing a major impact on its national interests.

2. China’s influence on South Korea

China’s existing influence on South Korea is primarily economic. However, at this level, the US and European markets have a greater impact on South Korea. Therefore, South Korea actually embraces US and European economic policies more closely.
China holds a real geopolitical advantage over South Korea. However, for more than 60 years, China has shown no willingness to use this weapon, leading South Korean politicians to forget this important fact.
China understands South Korea’s reality. If South Korea behaves moderately in the Sino-US conflict, China would not express excessive resentment towards South Korea.
China has the capability to provoke a war on the Korean Peninsula at any time. China has the capability to provoke a conflict along the maritime border between China and South Korea at any time. China also has the capability to destroy the economic foundation of South Korea at any time.
If South Korea seriously angers China, China may directly strike South Korea. The strike would likely focus on ground military installations and the economic base. China is unlikely to seek to severely damage South Korea’s naval capabilities.
China will not allow South Korea to join a war at the “medium response level” or higher. South Korea cannot resist this political decision by China.

3. Russia’s influence on South Korea

Russia has a geopolitical advantage over South Korea. Although this advantage is hidden by its weaker economic power, Russia has the ability to activate it at any time.
Russia’s influence over South Korea is likely to be exercised more through proxies.
If Russia decides to strike South Korea, it will likely be an indiscriminate attack. It will not deliberately preserve any aspect of South Korea’s military strength.

4. North Korea’s influence on South Korea

Although both North and South Korea are pursuing reconciliation, it is foreseeable that there will be no major progress in the near future.
The antagonism between North and South Korea may intensify during the US-China conflict.
North Korea has a psychological advantage over South Korea, although this advantage cannot actually be superseded by political superiority, but it can be superseded by military capabilities.
North Korea actually has a geopolitical advantage over South Korea, although South Korea does not actually acknowledge this.
Cooperation between China or Russia and North Korea is a key area of close concern for South Korea. Even the slightest disturbance will attract South Korea’s attention. This is the fundamental reason why South Korea cannot fully commit to the conflict between the United States and China.

5. The History of South Korean Military Operations

In the early stages of the Sino-US conflict, actively participating in US-led military operations was in South Korea’s national interest and also in the interest of South Korean politicians. As a US colony, South Korea’s national interest lay in following the direction of its colonial power.
South Korea may participate in various military operations in the early stages of the US-China conflict. It can also participate in all low-level military conflicts.
The timeline for South Korea’s withdrawal of troops will be when the United States decides to withdraw its military forces beyond the range of China’s intermediate-range ballistic missiles.
China will not allow South Korea to participate in a medium-level war or more significant military operations in order to reduce the risks facing China. South Korea lacks the capacity to resist China’s political resolve because, compared to the United States, China has a greater capacity to destroy South Korea’s national interests.
South Korea also lacks the capacity to resist Russia’s political decisions. If Russia were to launch a war against South Korea through proxies, South Korea would be forced to compromise. Even when Russia threatens to do so, South Korea would back down.
South Korea certainly has the capability to resist a military strike from North Korea, but only if there is no intervention from China or Russia.

Summary:

South Korea is an unavoidable party in the script of the US-China conflict. It is a major member of the US-led alliance and a key participant in early and low-level conflicts. However, South Korea lacks the political foundation for a full-scale war with China, Russia, or even North Korea. This political deficiency allows South Korea to actively intervene in low-level conflicts but prevents it from engaging in medium- or higher-level warfare. The assumption that South Korea will rapidly withdraw from the war process as the level of conflict escalates is foreseeable.

Similar Posts

  • China’s military unification plan (2): Variables facing China and the United States

    Preview Date Mar. 29, 2023 Updated Date September 8, 2023   (This is an outline of an incomplete research project.) summary: If China launches a cross-Taiwan military operation in 2026, the United States will find it difficult to respond appropriately. Mainland China possesses a clear military advantage in areas covered by intermediate-range ballistic missiles, as…

  • The Fears of China’s Moderates (1): The Greatest Obstacle to China’s Unification Efforts

    The moderate elites within China’s political system unanimously oppose the idea of ​​China unifying Taiwan by force. Their opposition stems from their fears, including: China’s overall national strength is insufficient to counter the US bloc; the involvement of Japan and South Korea would drag China into a prolonged period of economic depletion; continued resistance from the Taiwanese people would cause China to suffer long-term losses; and the forceful unification of Taiwan would set back China’s development. However, Ye, Qiquan holds a completely opposite view. Ye argues that China’s overall national war capability will have surpassed that of the United States by 2022; Japan and South Korea, while initially likely participants in a Sino-US war, will inevitably join China’s camp in the later stages; forceful unification is a shortcut to quickly establishing a new East Asian order; this new East Asian order is the cornerstone of the Sino-Asian empire; it is the cornerstone that forces the United States to choose the “North American-East Asian axis”; establishing the next generation of world order inevitably involves a period of chaos; the Taiwan base, the new East Asian order, and China’s forceful unification action are key to shortening this chaotic period; and compared to other options, the “North American-East Asian axis” is more readily accepted by the Americans.

  • Even if Carrie Lam commits suicide, it will not help the situation in Hong Kong.

    The Carrie Lam SAR government has effectively agreed to all five demands of the pro-democracy camp. Now, they may back down again, possibly agreeing to establish a special investigation team to investigate “police abuse of power.” If this is true, as reported, it would be tantamount to Lam’s “political suicide.” Even if Lam takes this step, it won’t actually help ease the situation in Hong Kong. The opposition’s fundamental goal isn’t the so-called demands, but rather to create long-term chaos in Hong Kong. What Lam needs is a calm mind and a sincere advisory team to help her. Chairman Mao once said, “When the key link is grasped, everything else falls into place.” Lam and her team need to learn politics and find a bottom line for their defense.

  • In December 2026, Taiwan and Xi Jinping will share a life-or-death line.

    Abstract: There are already very clear signs that China’s plan for military unification has been postponed until at least the end of 2027. It is highly likely that this action will be delayed until after 2029. Of course, what we are discussing today is a very low probability scenario—namely, that there is a certain chance China might suddenly launch its unification process in December 2026 or slightly earlier.

  • Two words to sum up Hong Kong people: greedy and foolish.

    Hong Kong people, having already acquired full legislative, judicial, and judicial powers, are attempting to “seize” “full executive power.” These three powers constitute the entire power framework of an independent nation. The Chinese central government cannot allow Hong Kong people, who are “politically incapable,” to seize national power. Reclaiming some of the powers previously granted to Hong Kong people is the only possible option for the Chinese central government. The Hong Kong people’s “rebellion” will not only fail to achieve its intended benefits but will also jeopardize the maintenance and continuation of “one country, two systems” in Hong Kong, and will also jeopardize the prospects of “one country, two systems” in Taiwan.

  • Ye, Qiquan: China needs a deep solution to integrate its three political powers.

    Ye, Qiquan believes that: 1. China’s major political families are currently all embroiled in political turmoil. 2. China is currently in a state of separation among its three major political powers. 3. China’s top priority at present is to find a solution to effectively integrate these three power entities into a single entity. 4. The vision of effectively integrating these three power entities into a single entity is difficult to achieve because there is no clear entry point. 5. Ye, Qiquan suggests that launching a “China Unification Initiative” might serve as a starting point for effectively integrating these three power entities. 6. He points out that although the Chinese military is powerful, it is in fact extremely vulnerable. (This assessment was validated on January 24, 2026, when Zhang Youxia was cut off from the Chinese military.) 7. He notes that while the “Daoist Tradition” faction (the Xi Jinping group) possesses philosophical appeal, it struggles to ensure its own security.